Anchor text analyser
The words of a link tell readers and search engines what’s on the other side. We read every internal link inside your articles and flag three habits that waste them: generic text like “click here”, the same phrase on nearly every link into a page, and one phrase pointing at several different pages.
Free · No account · A scan of your site
We read the links in your writing
Every internal link inside an article, from the same free scan as the other tools. Menus, footers and related-posts blocks are left out.
We classify each link’s words
Generic, a brand name, an exact match for the page’s title, or a phrase describing the page — the rules our product uses, tightened so a phrase like “website builder” is not called generic.
We flag three patterns
Generic text; pages where 60% or more of at least four links use one phrase; and one phrase that points to more than one page.
What Google and the research say
Google asks for link text that is descriptive, reasonably concise and relevant to both pages, and names “click here” and “read more” as examples to avoid. It also warns against stuffing link text with keywords.1 Its starter guide puts it simply: the words should tell people and Google what the linked page is about before they click.2
Repetition is a different matter. Google’s John Mueller has said that linking to the same page with the same words several times is normal and nothing to worry about.3 So this tool never calls repetition a penalty. What the data does suggest is that variety helps: in Zyppy’s study of 23 million internal links on 1,800 sites, pages whose incoming links used more varied wording got more clicks from search — a correlation, not proof.4
How the analyser decides
Generic
The whole link is a phrase that says nothing about its destination (“here”, “this post”, “website”), or it opens with one (“read more about…”, “click here to…”). A descriptive phrase that merely starts with a common word — “website builder”, “more sales” — is not generic.
Same words every time
A page with at least four links pointing to it from your writing, where 60% or more of them use one phrase. Both numbers are our own threshold — no source gives one — chosen so that a page with three links is never flagged, and so the flag means most of the wording, not some of it.
Same words, different pages
One phrase that links to two or more different pages. A reader who meets “sourdough starter” twice expects it to lead to the same place, and two pages claiming one phrase is a hint they may compete for the same search.
Limits
Up to 500 pages. Image links use their alt text as their words, as Google does; an image with no alt text has no words to judge and is skipped. Links from other websites are not part of this — this is about the links you control.
How to read your results
- What your link text says — the mix across the whole site. Most of it describing the page is what you want.
- Generic — each phrase with how often it is used and where. Replace it with words from the same sentence.
- Same words every time — not an error. When you next add links to these pages, describe them a different way.
- Same words, different pages — the one to act on: pick the page that phrase should mean and point every use at it.
What to do next
Our guide to choosing anchor text for internal links has examples of good and weak wording, and the one on using exact-match keywords in links covers when using a page’s keyword is fine.
A phrase pointing at two pages is often a sign those pages compete — the keyword cannibalization checker confirms it with your search data. To see every link into a single page with its words, use the page link inspector. When Silotree suggests a link it always wraps words already in your sentence, varies the wording into each page and never uses one phrase for two destinations.
How this compares with other free tools
As each tool’s own page described it when we checked on 11 October 2026. Tools change — if a line here is out of date, tell us and we will correct it.
| Tool | Limits | Menu and footer links kept apart? |
|---|---|---|
| This tool | Whole site up to 500 pages; no account | Yes — only links in the writing |
| LinkBoss anchor text cannibalization checker | 50 URLs per check; exact text only; no fixes | Not stated |
| Linkilo anchor text diversity checker | One page, or anchors you paste | Has an internal-links-only option |
| QuickSEO internal linking audit | One page at a time | Shows a link position; menus not confirmed as separate |
Sources
Each one is labelled with how much weight it can bear. Where the evidence is thin, the page says so.
- Google documentation Google Search Central — Link best practices for Google (updated Dec 2025). Every page you care about should be linked from at least one other page; there is no ideal number of links; anchor text should be descriptive, concise and not stuffed with keywords.
- Google documentation Google Search Central — SEO Starter Guide (updated Dec 2025). Google finds most new pages through links; link text should tell people and Google what the linked page is about.
- Google, said publicly Search Engine Journal — Google on diluting SEO impact through anchor text overuse (Apr 2025). John Mueller: repeating a link with the same words is normal; menus and footers are treated apart from the main content, and links in the writing say more about the page they point to.
- Study Zyppy (Cyrus Shepard) — 23 million internal links: SEO case study. Across 1,800 sites, pages with more internal links pointing to them got more Search Console clicks up to roughly 40–50 links; varied link text went with more clicks. Correlation, not proof.
About the anchor text analyzer
What is anchor text?
The visible, clickable words of a link. Google asks for anchor text that is descriptive, reasonably concise and relevant to the page it links to, and advises against generic text like “click here”.
Is using the same anchor text many times bad?
Not in itself — Google has said repeating a link with the same words is normal. This tool shows it as something to vary rather than a problem: a large study found pages described in more varied ways got more clicks.
Why is one phrase pointing to two pages a problem?
If “sourdough starter” links to one post in one article and a different post in another, readers can't predict where it goes, and two pages are claiming the same phrase. One destination per phrase is clearer.
Is exact-match anchor text safe for internal links?
Using a page's main phrase as link text is normal and useful. Google's line is against keyword stuffing — link text crammed with keywords — not against a link that names what the page is about.
Does this check links from other websites?
No. It reads internal links on your own site — the ones you can change. Backlink anchor text needs a backlink tool.
Same scan, other questions
- Keyword cannibalization checkerSearches two or more of your pages compete for, with the page to keep.
- Orphan page finderPages no article links to, dead ends, and your sitemap against your links.
- Internal links to a pageEvery link into and out of one page, with the words each link uses.
- Click depth checkerHow many clicks each page sits from your home page, counting only links in your writing.
- Internal links per page calculatorType a word count, get a sensible range of links — and why.
- Internal linking health quizTen questions, a score out of 100, and what to fix first.
- Which internal linking plugin?An honest picker — it recommends other tools where they fit better.
See every finding at once.
The full free audit: unlinked posts, dead ends, broken links and redirects. No account, no card.
Free audit · No account needed · No changes to your site