Find the right fit for your archive.
Six tools that help with internal links, compared by how they actually work. Each page says where Silotree fits, where the other tool is stronger, and who should buy it instead.
What Silotree is for: more readers from posts you already wrote — you approve a few links from a weekly email, about ten minutes a week.
- Free audit, no account
- First 10 links written free
- 30-day money-back guarantee
Side by side, before you read the detail.
Silotree vs Link Whisper
The closest comparison there is. Both suggest internal links and insert them; the difference is whether the tool holds an opinion about the shape of your site.
Link Whisper reads your text, suggests relevant targets and inserts them in bulk, with auto-link rules, topic clustering and Search Console keyword data in Premium.
Silotree starts from the posts nothing links to and suggests links from posts you already wrote, best first — up to five a week by email, each one wrapping words already in the sentence.
Silotree vs LinkBoss
The one comparison that turns on a single decision: whether a tool is allowed to add sentences to your published writing.
LinkBoss is also built around grouping posts into sections (often called silos), and will compose a sentence to carry a link where none of your existing words fit.
Silotree only ever wraps words already in your paragraph.
Silotree vs Internal Link Juicer
Automatic keyword linking against reviewed structural linking — two different answers to what an internal link is for.
Internal Link Juicer maps keywords to target URLs and links them automatically wherever they appear, at render time.
Silotree proposes each link individually, with the sentence it will sit in, and writes it into the post only when approved.
Silotree vs Rank Math
A suite that does thirty things against a tool that does one. The question is whether internal linking is a checkbox or the work.
Rank Math handles titles, schema, sitemaps, redirects, and much else, with internal link counts and suggestions among them.
Silotree does internal linking and nothing else: it models the structure, ranks every link by expected clicks, and reports decay against it.
Silotree vs Yoast SEO
Yoast helps with the post in front of you. The problem on a two-thousand-post blog is the nineteen hundred behind it.
Yoast SEO Premium's internal linking suggestions read the post you are writing and offer related posts to link to, alongside the rest of a mature SEO suite.
Silotree works the other way round: it reads the whole archive first, works out which posts nothing links to and which topics have no main page, and then tells you what to do — including which older posts should link to the one you just published.
Silotree vs Screaming Frog
Not really competitors. One is the best crawler there is; the other is a tool for doing something about what a crawl found.
Screaming Frog crawls anything and measures more than any other tool: status codes, depth, redirects, canonicals, hreflang, response times, and every link on the site.
Silotree crawls a narrower set of things and then does the part a crawler cannot: decides which link is worth adding, writes it into the post with your approval, and reports whether it worked using Search Console.
Three rules, so you can judge them.
Every page admits where it loses
If a comparison never gives ground, it is an advertisement. Each of these marks the rows where the other tool is better, and says who should buy it.
No prices
Prices change and a stale one reads as a lie. These pages describe how each tool works, which is what the decision actually turns on.
Corrections welcome
Everything here is from public documentation and dated. If we have something wrong about your tool, tell us and it changes.
The fairest comparison is your own archive.
Run the free audit — no account. Your first 10 links are written free, approved from a weekly email, and paid plans come with a 30-day money-back guarantee.
Free audit · No account needed · No changes to your site